(January 24, 2026 at 4:07 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote:(January 24, 2026 at 1:44 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: The article doesn’t say what prompted the feds to shoot the man beyond the fact that he ‘had a gun’. Did he brandish it? Did he actually open fire on the Stormtroopers? Was he shot simply because he was in possession of a gun? Most importantly, did he even HAVE a gun? At this point, I’m not willing to accept anything DHS says.
Boru
Latest I read, and it's not conclusive, is that he had a gun, which he had a licence for, was disarmed, and then shot afterwards.
Time for Americans to start shooting back.
If they won't honor the social contract, why should we?
