RE: Your view on Race Communism?
August 21, 2026 at 12:45 am
(This post was last modified: August 21, 2026 at 12:45 am by PepsiMAX.)
(August 20, 2026 at 11:35 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:(August 20, 2026 at 3:12 pm)PepsiMAX Wrote: It also has an outdated term. Which is about race mixing. But i do feel that was more on the... paranoia elements of people who went with that term
When i mean race communism, i mean its comparable to race politics, of people such as Adolf Hitler. But done for different reasons. Hitler was a Race politician. But he argued more on the basis of Aryan Whites against non Whites. Whereas a Race Communist will argue causes for the sake of non Whites against Whites.
This is different from the typical Classless type of politics that some Communists will argue for. Modern examples of this is either Kyle Kulinski or Hasan Piker. For example. They will attack Saudi Arabia for human rights abuses, absolute monarch (Islamism) and all those things. But be massively silent on Iran. Why? Because Iran is anti Western proxy of China.
But whats your view on this?
I should also note. Woodrow Wilson was a progressive, maybe not a socialist. But he was part of a political movement that Liberals seems to support. Since Communism is basically anything Strong Central Government. Whether it’s the Third Reich, USSR, Abraham Lincoln Federalism or EU. The keyword is "collectivism". Elitists, plutocrats and the ultra wealthy
The bolded and italicized part were done by me.
I bolded it because the bolded part is pretty much what communism actually means. It sounds like what you’re describing as “race communism” has nothing to do with actual communism.
And noticing that you actually gave your own definition of Communism as “anything strong central government,” (italics also coming from me) covering everything between authoritarian regimes, the nation-states of a region working together to make trade smoother, or evidently, just having a functioning federal government at all, it would seem that most countries would have to be communist by default, unless they’re in war-torn parts of the world where the government is basically armed gangs (eg Haiti, Yemen, Somalia, Sudan, the Congo, Libya post-Gadaffi).
Conclusion: you have no idea what the fuck you’re talking about, maybe take some Political Science courses so you can at least make coherent claims.
I got most of my political science from Deus Ex 2000 game. But i am studying currently at University. So its gonna be interesting to what rhetorics they would argue for, in the framework of Liberal Democracy. I also studied the book called "Battle Cry of Freedom" by James McPherson, relating to the American Civil War.

