Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 11, 2025, 8:37 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally.
#33
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally.
(December 7, 2011 at 7:38 pm)Barre Wrote: [quote='Chuck' pid='213251' dateline='1323235692']
What's the point of agonizing over the correct interpretation of a particular word in a piece of an out and out lie that has been purposedly edited to suit multiple unmentionable purposes and been intentionally and unintentionally transcribed a hundred times?

There is no agonizing, only an attempt to interpret a biblical text.

You seem unwilling for some reason to study something that you regard as a lie.


Why would we need to study something that we have determined to be fictional - and NOT true. And especially - WHY would we consider YOUR interpretation of any word in the bible - when YOU did not write it - nor have you presented any reason to accept your position - based on education.

The problem is that studying a SINGLE word in a document that YOU cannot provide the original text for - is useless. And - using a translated word is even worse. After all of the changes - and edits - and translations - the idea that you can decide the importance of a single word - when YOU cannot establish if that word was even USED originally.

For example - the bible clearly states that the earth is built on "pillars". THe problem is that the word "pillars" has been interpreted beyond the meaning of the original Hebrew word in the bible - which is yqxm. THe root of the word is "to melt" - and therefore means a molten like pillar - and is also used in Samuel referring to a mountain. English speaking people have claimed the "pillars" to be all sorts of things like faith and truth - but in fact - the original word in Hebrew does NOT mean that - it means the MOUNTAIN upon which a building was built - ie a construction term.

We cannot interpret the bible based on a single word - since there is NO reason to believe any of them are original. What we can do is interpret the bible based on sentences and ideas - which prove that the bible is a work of ancient myths and beliefs - that we know are NOT true today.

AS far as there being some things TRUE in the bible - that is simply a normal method of fiction writing - there is a LONDON - that does not make Sherlock Holmes - Harry Potter - or James Boind or any of the stories real. THERE are true things in all so called scripture - of all religions. I can point to some in the Koran - does that make the Koran truth?
Reply



Messages In This Thread
The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 1:20 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 7:38 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 7:57 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by ThomM - January 8, 2012 at 8:15 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 7:44 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 9:17 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 14, 2011 at 4:01 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - January 6, 2012 at 12:38 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - January 22, 2012 at 8:57 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 19, 2011 at 7:37 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 26, 2011 at 2:57 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 8:14 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by ThomM - December 7, 2011 at 7:59 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by padraic - December 14, 2011 at 5:50 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - January 22, 2012 at 7:29 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Phil - January 23, 2012 at 10:37 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - January 24, 2012 at 12:27 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  I literally cannot avoid sinning; so, why... zwanzig 70 9848 July 23, 2023 at 7:43 am
Last Post: no one
  Is this a contradiction or am I reading it wrong? Genesis 5:28 Ferrocyanide 110 24265 April 10, 2023 at 3:32 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  Question to theists: When to take the bible literally? T.J. 22 3259 November 26, 2021 at 6:14 pm
Last Post: onlinebiker
  They're going to be chanting to the wrong God. brewer 32 4824 March 17, 2021 at 2:39 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Theism is literally childish I_am_not_mafia 391 89965 November 16, 2017 at 6:28 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  Jesus did not rise from the dead -- My debate opening statement. Jehanne 155 37875 January 21, 2017 at 1:28 am
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  The Historical Reliability of the New Testament Randy Carson 706 172125 June 9, 2015 at 12:04 pm
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  Historical Easter Question for Minimalist thesummerqueen 26 9570 April 5, 2015 at 3:47 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
Exclamation Jesus is Dead Cinjin 73 19724 February 12, 2015 at 3:49 pm
Last Post: robvalue
  In Christianity, Does Jesus' Soul Have Anything To Do With Why Jesus Is God? JesusIsGod7 18 8614 October 7, 2014 at 12:58 pm
Last Post: JesusHChrist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)