Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 1, 2025, 10:32 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Food for thought
#20
RE: Food for thought
(July 13, 2009 at 7:56 pm)Anto Kennedy Wrote: There's nothing occult about the zodiac. It's presence in a Jewish synagogue means nothing, at least not what you are claiming.

I have never come across a "scholar", as Padraig puts it, back that theory.

Quote:Rulers became stars and common souls became part of the Milky Way which the ancients correctly deduced was a group of stars. Meteors were seen as souls coming to earth to enter the body. The heavens had gates. Souls would enter via Cancer and leave via Capricorn.

Evidence for these wild claims would be appreciated.

I reiterate, Heaven is Heaven, just the sky, nothing else.

The previously mentioned Allen's book is my evidence for my "wild claims." Try to keep up.
Richard H. Allen, Star Names, Their Lore and Meaning (Dover Publishing, 1963),
107.
“[A]ccording to Chaldaean [sic] and Platonist philosophy, it [Cancer] was supposed
Gate of Men through which souls descended from heaven into human bodies.”

I am not sure what you mean by occult. The Babylonian Talmud is full of astrological discussions. There are also astrological references in the DSS and even the Bible. There is much evidence that there is an underlying cosmic myth within the Bible itself. However, the enormity of such evidence to overcome the status quo, can not be expressed in a forum. That is why I wrote a book (100,000+ words) to explain the details of the cosmic myth which presents itself in the Bible. It will soon be out in paper back from Booksurge: "On Earth as it is in Heaven" subtitle: "The Cosmic Roots of the Bible." Older working copies are available from Lulu publishers, although I don't recommend the as I have added some important discoveries to the text and have not updated them in Lulu.

The cosmic myth idea of Judaism is not new. Its presence in a number of Jewish synagogues does mean something, especially in one of them they place the Greeek god Helios. The synagagoues from that same time period to the south of Judea, do not have the mosaics, but rather they write the names of the zodiac signs on the walls of the synagogue. This is very significant as it demonstrates that the zodiac played a role in their religion.

16th century astronomers attempted to place Bible stories in the constellations as did earlier Kabbalah texts. The midrashim alters OT stories to conform with Greek cosmic myths, whereby we can draw parallels and make comparisons to Arabic and Babylonian astrology. The synagogues and midrashim?talmud date the astrology connection to 200 AD or so. The DSS scrolls take us back to 100 BCE.

The book of Matthew is a fusion of ancient astrology from Babylon circa 2000 BCE with the prevailing Greek and Roman views (manger, inn, riding the ass.)

The OT is primarily Arab and Babylonian astrology. There is however later astrological views inserted into the text. This had the effect, in many cases, of creating contradictions, similar to the way contradictions were created in Gilgamesh through the addition of texts (Tigay).

I agree the ancients thought heaven was the sky, and the sky was heaven.
(July 13, 2009 at 9:28 pm)LEDO Wrote:
(July 13, 2009 at 7:56 pm)Anto Kennedy Wrote: There's nothing occult about the zodiac. It's presence in a Jewish synagogue means nothing, at least not what you are claiming.

I have never come across a "scholar", as Padraig puts it, back that theory.

Quote:Rulers became stars and common souls became part of the Milky Way which the ancients correctly deduced was a group of stars. Meteors were seen as souls coming to earth to enter the body. The heavens had gates. Souls would enter via Cancer and leave via Capricorn.

Evidence for these wild claims would be appreciated.

I reiterate, Heaven is Heaven, just the sky, nothing else.

The previously mentioned Allen's book is my evidence for my "wild claims." Try to keep up.
Richard H. Allen, Star Names, Their Lore and Meaning (Dover Publishing, 1963),
107.
“[A]ccording to Chaldaean [sic] and Platonist philosophy, it [Cancer] was supposed
Gate of Men through which souls descended from heaven into human bodies.”

I am not sure what you mean by occult. The Babylonian Talmud is full of astrological discussions. There are also astrological references in the DSS and even the Bible. There is much evidence that there is an underlying cosmic myth within the Bible itself. However, the enormity of such evidence to overcome the status quo, can not be expressed in a forum. That is why I wrote a book (100,000+ words) to explain the details of the cosmic myth which presents itself in the Bible. It will soon be out in paper back from Booksurge: "On Earth as it is in Heaven" subtitle: "The Cosmic Roots of the Bible." Older working copies are available from Lulu publishers, although I don't recommend the as I have added some important discoveries to the text and have not updated them in Lulu.

The cosmic myth idea of Judaism is not new. Its presence in a number of Jewish synagogues does mean something, especially in one of them they place the Greeek god Helios. The synagagoues from that same time period to the south of Judea, do not have the mosaics, but rather they write the names of the zodiac signs on the walls of the synagogue. This is very significant as it demonstrates that the zodiac played a role in their religion.

16th century astronomers attempted to place Bible stories in the constellations as did earlier Kabbalah texts. The midrashim alters OT stories to conform with Greek cosmic myths, whereby we can draw parallels and make comparisons to Arabic and Babylonian astrology. The synagogues and midrashim?talmud date the astrology connection to 200 AD or so. The DSS scrolls take us back to 100 BCE.

The book of Matthew is a fusion of ancient astrology from Babylon circa 2000 BCE with the prevailing Greek and Roman views (manger, inn, riding the ass.)

The OT is primarily Arab and Babylonian astrology. There is however later astrological views inserted into the text. This had the effect, in many cases, of creating contradictions, similar to the way contradictions were created in Gilgamesh through the addition of texts (Tigay).

I agree the ancients thought heaven was the sky, and the sky was heaven.
"On Earth as it is in Heaven, the Cosmic Roots of the Bible" available on the Amazon.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Food for thought - by AngelaRachnid - July 7, 2009 at 8:44 pm
RE: Food for thought - by LEDO - July 7, 2009 at 8:55 pm
RE: Food for thought - by Anto Kennedy - July 8, 2009 at 3:40 am
RE: Food for thought - by LEDO - July 8, 2009 at 7:07 am
RE: Food for thought - by fr0d0 - July 8, 2009 at 8:14 am
RE: Food for thought - by Anto Kennedy - July 8, 2009 at 5:24 pm
RE: Food for thought - by LEDO - July 8, 2009 at 6:39 pm
RE: Food for thought - by Anto Kennedy - July 9, 2009 at 9:10 am
RE: Food for thought - by Purple Rabbit - July 12, 2009 at 5:33 am
RE: Food for thought - by LEDO - July 12, 2009 at 4:13 pm
RE: Food for thought - by LEDO - July 9, 2009 at 3:14 pm
RE: Food for thought - by Purple Rabbit - July 9, 2009 at 3:24 pm
RE: Food for thought - by LEDO - July 9, 2009 at 3:43 pm
RE: Food for thought - by padraic - July 9, 2009 at 8:49 pm
RE: Food for thought - by LEDO - July 10, 2009 at 6:52 am
RE: Food for thought - by Anto Kennedy - July 13, 2009 at 11:44 am
RE: Food for thought - by LEDO - July 13, 2009 at 5:29 pm
RE: Food for thought - by padraic - July 13, 2009 at 7:55 pm
RE: Food for thought - by Anto Kennedy - July 13, 2009 at 7:56 pm
RE: Food for thought - by LEDO - July 13, 2009 at 9:28 pm
RE: Food for thought - by Anto Kennedy - July 14, 2009 at 11:56 am
RE: Food for thought - by LEDO - July 14, 2009 at 6:45 pm
RE: Food for thought - by Anto Kennedy - July 15, 2009 at 1:59 pm
RE: Food for thought - by padraic - July 14, 2009 at 9:48 pm
RE: Food for thought - by LEDO - July 15, 2009 at 7:02 pm
RE: Food for thought - by Anto Kennedy - July 15, 2009 at 8:22 pm
RE: Food for thought - by padraic - July 15, 2009 at 9:38 pm
RE: Food for thought - by Anto Kennedy - July 16, 2009 at 12:57 pm
RE: Food for thought - by LEDO - July 16, 2009 at 7:27 pm
RE: Food for thought - by padraic - July 16, 2009 at 8:40 pm
RE: Food for thought - by LEDO - July 16, 2009 at 9:29 pm
RE: Food for thought - by Anto Kennedy - July 17, 2009 at 1:41 pm
RE: Food for thought - by LEDO - July 17, 2009 at 7:28 pm
RE: Food for thought - by Anto Kennedy - July 23, 2009 at 9:30 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Came across something on YouTube and had a very immature thought GODZILLA 20 4297 October 5, 2018 at 9:30 am
Last Post: onlinebiker
  How do religious people justify raising and slaughtering animals for food? Alexmahone 113 20034 December 6, 2017 at 7:15 pm
Last Post: Little Rik
  A Thought Experiment for Believers and Atheists Alike chimp3 39 11645 October 11, 2017 at 3:25 am
Last Post: Ivan Denisovich
  I guess you never thought about it, did you? Little Rik 68 20964 September 24, 2017 at 3:06 pm
Last Post: JackRussell
  Lust, sex, random thought PETE_ROSE 295 51621 August 23, 2016 at 12:14 pm
Last Post: Joods
  A passing thought A_Nony_Mouse 1 1431 April 10, 2013 at 8:55 am
Last Post: Zen Badger
Thumbs Down Buying you with food Napoléon 36 14288 March 4, 2012 at 3:01 pm
Last Post: Tempus
  So ...IF you are without adequate food water and housing this= your religiousness? KichigaiNeko 7 3502 August 10, 2011 at 12:50 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  More thought leads to less certainty...? inflectious 7 2870 May 20, 2011 at 6:57 am
Last Post: tackattack
  A Thought from a Deist Cinjin 42 17223 March 12, 2011 at 7:53 am
Last Post: Ace Otana



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)