RE: Exist vs. Real
July 15, 2009 at 10:46 am
(This post was last modified: July 15, 2009 at 10:50 am by Kyuuketsuki.)
(July 15, 2009 at 10:05 am)Rhizomorph13 Wrote: Everyone,
I know in my heart that she is pink; the fact that she is invisible is imaterial. Blessed be her hooves!
@Adrian,
Please respect my beliefs! All this logic is muddying the issue! It is hard for an intelligent person to understand why she is such, but of such she is! You cannot disprove that she is both invisible and pink and I know that she is both because it makes sense!
(July 13, 2009 at 10:56 pm)Demonaura Wrote: So my answer is this: to be real something MUST exist but, just because it exists does not mean it is real. The definition of the word existence does not assume reality, only subjective reality that may or may not be part of the actual, real world.
Trouble with that is it requires a re-definition of the word "real" ... IMO, things that exist in the mind still exist as thought. That is still detectable and the technology, although currently in very early stages, is being developed to visualise thought.
Kyu
Angry Atheism
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
