We should have no rule for it. The rule you need is already in the etiquette: "Insulting or offensive content will be deleted immediately. This includes unreasonable personal attacks on members, posting angry rants with no real objective, and spamming people with a large number of swear words instead of making a point."
Personally, though I have no impeccable track record myself, I think that someone who uses a lot af bad language aimed at people, should understand that this offenses people and is aggressive verbal behaviour. In such a case this behaviour has clearly insulting intent. Claiming a personal excuse (it's in my nature, I can't hide it, or things like that) are complete bull. You have a rule or not, privileges for some show weakness of moderation.
Personally, though I have no impeccable track record myself, I think that someone who uses a lot af bad language aimed at people, should understand that this offenses people and is aggressive verbal behaviour. In such a case this behaviour has clearly insulting intent. Claiming a personal excuse (it's in my nature, I can't hide it, or things like that) are complete bull. You have a rule or not, privileges for some show weakness of moderation.
"I'm like a rabbit suddenly trapped, in the blinding headlights of vacuous crap" - Tim Minchin in "Storm"
Christianity is perfect bullshit, christians are not - Purple Rabbit, honouring CS Lewis
Faith is illogical - fr0d0
Christianity is perfect bullshit, christians are not - Purple Rabbit, honouring CS Lewis
Faith is illogical - fr0d0
