Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 14, 2026, 6:56 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally.
#36
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally.
(January 7, 2012 at 6:58 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote:
Quote:You should take the Bible seriously because of its tremendous inlfuence it has

No thanks ...I'm not a Lemming

Please don't misunderstand. I am not advocating that you subscribe to Christianity, only to try and understand it.
(January 7, 2012 at 6:58 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote:
Quote:You should take the Bible seriously because of its tremendous inlfuence it has

No thanks ...I'm not a Lemming

Please don't misunderstand. I am not advocating that you subscribe to Christianity, only to try to understand it.
(January 7, 2012 at 6:58 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote:
Quote:You should take the Bible seriously because of its tremendous inlfuence it has

No thanks ...I'm not a Lemming

Please don't misunderstand. I am not advocating that you subscribe to Christianity, only to try to understand it.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 1:20 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 7:38 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 7:57 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 7:44 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 9:17 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 14, 2011 at 4:01 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - January 6, 2012 at 12:38 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - January 22, 2012 at 8:57 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 19, 2011 at 7:37 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 26, 2011 at 2:57 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 8:14 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by ThomM - December 7, 2011 at 7:59 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by padraic - December 14, 2011 at 5:50 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - January 22, 2012 at 7:29 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Phil - January 23, 2012 at 10:37 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - January 24, 2012 at 12:27 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  I literally cannot avoid sinning; so, why... zwanzig 70 18550 July 23, 2023 at 7:43 am
Last Post: no one
  Is this a contradiction or am I reading it wrong? Genesis 5:28 Ferrocyanide 110 40944 April 10, 2023 at 3:32 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  Question to theists: When to take the bible literally? T.J. 22 5655 November 26, 2021 at 6:14 pm
Last Post: onlinebiker
  They're going to be chanting to the wrong God. brewer 32 8060 March 17, 2021 at 2:39 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
Exclamation Christianity is Dead, Long live the rEvolution! Bow Before Zeus 77 29145 December 26, 2017 at 2:59 pm
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  Cardinal Bernard Law dead at 86 KevinM1 14 4362 December 21, 2017 at 9:25 pm
Last Post: chimp3
  Theism is literally childish I_am_not_mafia 391 139852 November 16, 2017 at 6:28 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  New Revised Standard Version Bible has Dead Sea Scroll input ?!?! vorlon13 17 6689 February 20, 2017 at 5:16 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  Jesus did not rise from the dead -- My debate opening statement. Jehanne 155 56946 January 21, 2017 at 1:28 am
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  Tim LaHaye is Dead! chimp3 29 7640 July 27, 2016 at 8:25 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic



Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)