That's the problem.
Everything he did was legit under the current rules/boundary conditions that we've imposed.
Could it possibly be because the Capitalistic model that we've been using is, *gasp*, incomplete?
There is nothing in Adam Smith's works that I can see that address the issue of a too-successful actor, other than asking said actor to "invest" and other play-nice things.
That's the same crap you're advocating as well.
Everything he did was legit under the current rules/boundary conditions that we've imposed.
Could it possibly be because the Capitalistic model that we've been using is, *gasp*, incomplete?
There is nothing in Adam Smith's works that I can see that address the issue of a too-successful actor, other than asking said actor to "invest" and other play-nice things.
That's the same crap you're advocating as well.
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
