(January 26, 2012 at 6:25 pm)Tiberius Wrote:(January 26, 2012 at 5:45 pm)Moros Synackaon Wrote: That's the problem.
Everything he did was legit under the current rules/boundary conditions that we've imposed.
Still don't see how it is a problem. He created a company, used it to create a product that was used by millions, and created jobs for hundreds of thousands of people. Like I said before, people didn't have to buy Microsoft products; there are plenty of alternatives on the free market, but for some reason people keep buying things made by Microsoft.
Heck, didn't the government / EU fine Microsoft ridiculous amounts of money anyway?
I notice you didn't even address my latter statements. Lovely.
In game design, if you have a system that is unbalanced, you don't blame the top players for that. You simply add in and remove conditions from that system and rebalance accordingly.
I keep on pointing out the massive accumulation of wealth at one of the distribution and you keep ignoring it.
Please, please tell me, what other solution do you have than "do nothing" and "try to reduce the burden on the rich"?
I see a lot of poor people on the other side, most of which who cannot, despite ability, compete effectively to raise out of poverty.
Ability is shit when you don't have the education or training to use it effectively.
However, if we were to reward ability and cultivate that, it would require resources.
And who has all the resources? Not the poor people. The rich, however...
Once again, devout capitalists refuse to admit their system is incomplete...
Slave to the Patriarchy no more