(July 18, 2009 at 3:50 am)Demonaura Wrote: You also have said a different thing here, before you said you disagreed with it because I was apparently redefining a word. Now you are saying you disagree because I was using it to serve an agenda (or at least it was written in a manner that implied that).
No I said whoever defined it was using it in that way ... maybe you are too? No idea!
(July 18, 2009 at 3:50 am)Demonaura Wrote: My version of 'real' has no exeptions except for that which is not a part of reality, hence the use of the word 'real'.
Why didn't you stick to that then?
(July 18, 2009 at 3:50 am)Demonaura Wrote: We define words to facilitate communication, for this purpose I sought to clarify those two words. Oh, and that I was under the impression it was the whole point of the bloody thread
Oh indeed hence my initial answer, "No ... next?" (or some such)!
Kyu
Angry Atheism
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
