RE: How many miracles needed in the Noah myth?
January 30, 2012 at 5:46 pm
(This post was last modified: January 30, 2012 at 5:47 pm by Doubting Thomas.)
OK, getting back to the discussion after that commercial message from Jesus, Inc.
GC, did you totally ignore where I mentioned the Wyoming? True, one was a powered vessel and the other not, but that doesn't matter. Waves upon the sea bending the hull is the important part. A 450 ft. long wooden ship built without iron supports just isn't going to hold together. It was the wave motion of the ocean which made the Wyoming actually bend along with the waves, opening cracks between planks requiring constant pumping.
Not to mention that there's just no way to put two or seven of every animal on board a boat that size and keep them alive for 150 days. You still need plenty of food for each animal, and plenty of room for a lot of them to move around.
But I do love how GC thinks he's refuted the argument just by providing one or two examples, but conveniently refuses to acknowledge ALL the arguments against the Noah myth being true. How are two members of one species of animal going to survive on a planet which was just recently flooded for half a year?
Yeah because then you get this:
![[Image: Banjo-Boy-Deliverance.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.tigernet.com%2Fservlet%2FJiveServlet%2Fdownload%2F9-1005448-11089879-92499%2FBanjo-Boy-Deliverance.jpg)
GC, did you totally ignore where I mentioned the Wyoming? True, one was a powered vessel and the other not, but that doesn't matter. Waves upon the sea bending the hull is the important part. A 450 ft. long wooden ship built without iron supports just isn't going to hold together. It was the wave motion of the ocean which made the Wyoming actually bend along with the waves, opening cracks between planks requiring constant pumping.
Not to mention that there's just no way to put two or seven of every animal on board a boat that size and keep them alive for 150 days. You still need plenty of food for each animal, and plenty of room for a lot of them to move around.
But I do love how GC thinks he's refuted the argument just by providing one or two examples, but conveniently refuses to acknowledge ALL the arguments against the Noah myth being true. How are two members of one species of animal going to survive on a planet which was just recently flooded for half a year?
(January 30, 2012 at 3:27 pm)Ace Otana Wrote: Inbreeding = Very bad idea.
Yeah because then you get this:
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
