(January 31, 2012 at 4:05 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: Even Michael Crook'sSo people should rather die than get raped how is that a pro-life stance?
1) In an ideal world, everyone would defend their virtue to the death
2) If someone survives rape, they failed to defend it.
3) Therefore, all "rape victims" were asking for it, even if they're newborns.
argument made some sort of logical sense, even if the premises were absolute bullshit.
"Sisters, you know only the north; I have traveled in the south lands. There are churches there, believe me, that cut their children too, as the people of Bolvangar did--not in the same way, but just as horribly. They cut their sexual organs, yes, both boys and girls; they cut them with knives so that they shan't feel. That is what the Church does, and every church is the same: control, destroy, obliterate every good feeling. So if a war comes, and the Church is on one side of it, we must be on the other, no matter what strange allies we find ourselves bound to."
-Ruta Skadi, The Subtle Knife
-Ruta Skadi, The Subtle Knife
