I am an orthodox Christian, ask me a question!

[Purple Rabbit]

Only it's local manifestation is, it's essence equals nothing less than the whole of non-contingent actuality.

Right. The vaccum cleaner has no necessary qualities of pure actuality (such as omnipotence, omniscience, eternality, immutability, mind, will, intellect, absolute perfection by being void of potentiality) and has done nothing to show that it has, and has no special significance within the course of the natural evolution of the universe. It is an entirely absurd suggestion.

I read little repentence in there. What you fail to see is that my vacuum cleaner only is a temporary physical manifestation of non-contingent actuality just what you claim for the Christ. Of course it has all the powers that go along with that, such as omnipotence, omniscience, eternality, immutability, mind, will, intellect, absolute perfection by being void of potentiality. That same non-contingent actuality that kicked your ass into this world long before you knew what happened. I deeply reject your suggestion that it is an entirely absurd suggestion. I did not spit on your Christ did I...so far. On your knees and pray three vacuum cleaner bags full of repentence son.

What you fail to see is that the matter of the impure actuality of the universe only lays the foundation for the necessity of monotheism,..

Correction: not monotheism but rather monovacuumcleanerism.

...which has nothing to do with specific questions like the divinity of Jesus. The one relevance to that is the fundamental coherence between scripture and pure actuality. God is defined as pure actuality. Yahweh means to be, and in the scriptures, this Yahweh, or He who is, defines his identity as "I am that I am". And Jesus defines himself as I AM as well, over 40 times in the New Testament, as in "Before Abraham was, I AM".

You haven't even read the manual of my vacuum cleaner! It clearly defines the vacuum cleaner as pure actuality: "used properly, your vacuum cleaner will function errorless". It says "errorless" not simply "I am a vacuum cleaner" (everybody can see that)! And it can clean carpets too!! Do you now what that means?! Of course it means that it is pure actuality itself!

All we have is the coherence between what we can know and what we need revelation to know. And here there is such a coherence. What follows are the attestations of omniscience, omnipotence, omnibenevolence, and so on, that we would expect for pure actuality's selfdemonstration.

Are you even on this earth? You just attached omniscience, omnipotence, omnibenevolence, and the whole of non-contingent actuality to the words "I am" written in a book that is a text bundle from multiple tribal sources of goat herders that lived several thousands years ago, copied, altered, revised, re-interpreted many times since then. If that is coherence to you, than anything can follow.

We can prove that God exists by natural means,

Another claim you haven't substantiated.

..and we can disprove theories that make no sense and are logically incoherent and contradictory of reality.

My vacuum cleaner exists and is completely in sync with reality, it is a physical manifestation of non-contingent actuality (or just plain reality as it is referred to outside theologian circles). You have no shred of evidence to deny this.

We can also know that humanity has a special relationship to God, that humanity has been generated in likeness of God, by being intellectual, by having great power, by having great knowledge, by being almost the god of the universe. Indeed even the fact that humanity understands the necessity of the transcendental God for the universes existence makes for this teleotic relationship.

This is a typical RC trait. The urge to be godlike.

We can know, by natural means therefore, that suggesting a fundamental teleotic relationship between God and humanity is rational, due to the likeness that exists between pure actuality and humanity analogiously. From that, we can only compare different worldviews and see what is more likely to be true, and a Christian worldview is certainly more likely to be true given these grounds, than a worldview which does not affirm Christianity to be true.

Argumentam ad arrogantiam. You have done nothing to show that the powers you claim for your god cannot be the powers of a Hindu god or Zoroastra or my vacuum cleaner. You only babble about how plain this is to see from the likeness between you and your god, that it follows from nature, that you have a special telephone line with god who says so. Your argument, eloquent as it may be, is utterly hollow.

But since this is the kind of argument you are going to continue with (which has nothing to do with the issue at hand, which I was dealing with in the post you responded to), we can either simply continue forever with absurd ideas, or I can simply stop wasting my time discussing with you. You're simply unable to stay on one topic and focus on what the topic is about.

If you cannot come up with hard evidence to distinguish my claim for my vacuum cleaner from your claim of your christian god, than you don't deserve my devoted attention to your postings.