RE: Is this a true Christian?
February 16, 2012 at 8:24 am
(This post was last modified: February 16, 2012 at 8:43 am by Epimethean.)
Aard, you seem to love to point out how people have gotten you wrong and been lost, and yet, many of us have arrived at the same conclusion, which is that you are an insecure little prick.
You openly stated that you admired assholes for their convictions, and that we should, too. Then, when the subject of Hitler was raised, you went off the deep end praising the man for the good things he did and asking if that was not a good way to look at him, rather than exclusively negatively. When it was pointed out that Hitler himself did nothing good because he was a completely bad egg, you defended him even as you sidestepped and "condemned" him.
Here's a little line you sent out to all of us, who then proceeded to get you so wrong and to stumble over your massive logic:
"I admire anyone with the courage of their convictions."
This was the beginning of your jumping hoops. Then you started bouncing all around, from admiring the people for their convictions, to admiring what they did, to the net effect of what they did, to any fucking thing at all to keep from being pinned down as having made a foolish statement.
Let us get this clearly, master of logic: You have been all over the place on this, but the core kernel of your argument has been that, if someone believes in what he or she does fully, that person is admirable. It is a very simple point, although you have danced all around on it to try to make it stick. It doesn't.
The fact that you have been insulting people by suggesting they are less intelligent or logical than you, all while demonstrating thinking errors yourself has shown you to be an inconsiderate ass, but then, you revealed that early on in this thread.
You openly stated that you admired assholes for their convictions, and that we should, too. Then, when the subject of Hitler was raised, you went off the deep end praising the man for the good things he did and asking if that was not a good way to look at him, rather than exclusively negatively. When it was pointed out that Hitler himself did nothing good because he was a completely bad egg, you defended him even as you sidestepped and "condemned" him.
Here's a little line you sent out to all of us, who then proceeded to get you so wrong and to stumble over your massive logic:
"I admire anyone with the courage of their convictions."
This was the beginning of your jumping hoops. Then you started bouncing all around, from admiring the people for their convictions, to admiring what they did, to the net effect of what they did, to any fucking thing at all to keep from being pinned down as having made a foolish statement.
Let us get this clearly, master of logic: You have been all over the place on this, but the core kernel of your argument has been that, if someone believes in what he or she does fully, that person is admirable. It is a very simple point, although you have danced all around on it to try to make it stick. It doesn't.
The fact that you have been insulting people by suggesting they are less intelligent or logical than you, all while demonstrating thinking errors yourself has shown you to be an inconsiderate ass, but then, you revealed that early on in this thread.
Trying to update my sig ...