Back to your original statements. Maybe I've missed something in the rambling theological language you constantly use, but your argument seems to be: Atheism is logically flawed because it rejects the notion that there is an 'objective moral truth'. Therefore everything else must be subjective and necessarily false, including atheism.
If this is an attempt to produce a logical fallacy, its woefully inadequate. Firstly you're lumping together morality and truth, when the two things are entirely seperate. Some things are objectively true regardless of belief (or non-belief) system, or morality i.e. The Earth orbits the sun.
Morality is a human concept which changes between cultures, over time etc. The very fact that our morality has developed and improved over time (i.e. slavery is now generally considered a bit of a no-no, despite its embedded history in cultural practice) goes to show that morality is a pliable concept.
If there was a higher moral infallibility (god), and religious people have been 'speaking' to god for thousands of years, surely the morality of the time wouldn't have been so primitive.
Feel free to point out if I've misunderstood your claim, but please refrain from descending into theological, pseudo-intellectual language to make your point. If when making a point, you do not successfully communicate your thoughts and intentions, you've failed; and would be better off not saying anything.
If this is an attempt to produce a logical fallacy, its woefully inadequate. Firstly you're lumping together morality and truth, when the two things are entirely seperate. Some things are objectively true regardless of belief (or non-belief) system, or morality i.e. The Earth orbits the sun.
Morality is a human concept which changes between cultures, over time etc. The very fact that our morality has developed and improved over time (i.e. slavery is now generally considered a bit of a no-no, despite its embedded history in cultural practice) goes to show that morality is a pliable concept.
If there was a higher moral infallibility (god), and religious people have been 'speaking' to god for thousands of years, surely the morality of the time wouldn't have been so primitive.
Feel free to point out if I've misunderstood your claim, but please refrain from descending into theological, pseudo-intellectual language to make your point. If when making a point, you do not successfully communicate your thoughts and intentions, you've failed; and would be better off not saying anything.
