RE: Evidence that God exists
July 27, 2009 at 6:42 pm
(This post was last modified: July 27, 2009 at 6:58 pm by Dotard.)
Well, it could be the noodly appendage the FSM wee-wee's out of.
Seems this only works if one presupposes your version of God exists.
Wow.
1: Eternal Grumlins are by definition eternal - i.e.they could not come into existence or leave existence, since they are not contingent beings.
2: If Eternal Grumlins exists, they're existence is necessary.................
(June 7, 2009 at 5:52 am)Cleanthes Wrote: Here's one:
1: God is by definition eternal - i.e. he could not come into existence or leave existence, since he is not a contingent being.
2: If God exists, his existence is necessary.......... (snip)
Seems this only works if one presupposes your version of God exists.
Wow.
1: Eternal Grumlins are by definition eternal - i.e.they could not come into existence or leave existence, since they are not contingent beings.
2: If Eternal Grumlins exists, they're existence is necessary.................
I used to tell a lot of religious jokes. Not any more, I'm a registered sects offender.
---------------
...the least christian thing a person can do is to become a christian. ~Chuck
---------------
NO MA'AM
---------------
...the least christian thing a person can do is to become a christian. ~Chuck
---------------
NO MA'AM