RE: Evidence that God exists
July 28, 2009 at 8:08 am
(This post was last modified: July 28, 2009 at 8:24 am by Anto Kennedy.)
(July 28, 2009 at 7:58 am)Tiberius Wrote: if we accept that the universe is material, we can say that things can never be truly disproven. If we accept that the universe is immaterial, technically the only way of knowing things would be through omniscience through the very beings we are arguing about in the first place.
Therefore if God exists, the only way to find out is to "ask and it will be given you", "seek and you shall find".
Unless you make an effort to percieve god, you're being unscientific. Science is perception, if you can't perceive anything, try and try again untill your perceive "something".
There is no burden of proof for either side in the debate. However, the burden is on the atheist to see for themselves what all the fuss is about.
And if God does not exist, then you have to keep looking anyway, we aren't omniscient so we can never know for sure that God doesn't exist. If you give up, you're not being scientific.
Therefore, atheism, is unscientific ASWELL as being irrational.
God is Love
Love is the absolute moral authority, moral compass. If not, then it wouldn't be Love.
If atheists don't believe in God, they don't believe in Love.
If atheists don't believe in Love, and Love is the absolute moral authority, then atheists are immoral.
Love cannot be proven nor disproven. But those without Love will do everything in their power to find it. If you do not seek Love, you do not Love yourself. Which breaks the two greatest commandments, "Love yourself, as you Love others" and "Love Love (God)"
If you don't want Love, simply because it is irrational, I pity you.
Hope you find it.
