(August 8, 2009 at 9:43 am)Jon Paul Wrote: Sure, God in himself is outside our direct detection ability, like if I see some footprints in the snow and no animal, the animal is outside my direct detection ability. That doesn't mean there are no ways to know that the animal exists. You can still evaluate the aposteriori evidence that the animal was here, like you can evaluate the aposteriori evidence that God created the universe
But we already know about animals and their footprints. God doesn't leave any. What makes you think god created everything? What makes you so sure he exists? Just because the univurse exists doens't automaticly mean god did it. Not everything needs a designer or creater. Evolution is a process that requires no outside intelligance. Planets, solar systems and galaxes can form on their own.
How did god come into existance? How did he create energy? What makes you so sure he exists and done what you think he did. I don't believe in this fairytale of yours. It's too simplistic, it lacks details and it lacks evidence.
Even if there was a god, which god and why? Also why should I believe it?
When I look around I see formation not creation. Things can form on their own.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
