(March 14, 2012 at 6:53 pm)reverendjeremiah Wrote:The social aspect? Really, I'd rather have a state that supplies me with free healthcare and education.(March 14, 2012 at 2:59 pm)kılıç_mehmet Wrote: Where is socialism in anarchy?
Who shall build a social construct and distribute social services in a state of anarchy?
It sounds like a paradox to me.
Thats because it is the polar opposite of your political views. Remove the state and capitalism is no longer king. People will naturally come together to survive, thus the social aspect.
Banding together in a world without a state and law does not necessarily grant you any of these above. Maybe if you had an eternal surplus of any of the mentioned above, with a surplus of food that will feed you for eternity, maybe than you'd have your anarchist paradise.
Other than that, anarchy only brings destruction.
Üze Tengri basmasar, asra Yir telinmeser, Türük bodun ilingin törüngin kim artatı udaçı erti?