I am an orthodox Christian, ask me a question!

[Edwardo Piet]

Where's the problem?

The problem is that you claim that logic and truth exists independently of the conceptual realisation of it by a mind, and to substantiate this, you appeal to your own conceptual realisation of it. In other words, your very substantiation of the claim contradicts the claim it self.

I can only appeal to my own conceptual realisation of this, because I can't appear outside of that because my mind is subjective! Duh!

I detect the existence of the objective through subjective means, it may exist it may not, I may be wrong I may be right. I don't need absolute proof, evidence is enough.

This is all fine and enough. Evidence is rational

So where's the evidence for an 'objective mind' then?

EvF