(August 12, 2009 at 8:43 pm)Pippy Wrote: I have explained it already, but for clarity let me repeat. I feel that threatening to ban me for one sentence that you misunderstood counts as nothing. So if I truly feel that you are threatening to ban me for nothing, to say so is not a lie at all. Just because we disagree, one of us is not necessarily lying. I think this whole conversation could be best described as petty.I did not threaten to ban you for one sentence. This is a lie. I warned you that such sentences could be taken as you attempting to cause trouble, and that if you wanted to cause trouble, you would be banned.
In other words (since you don't seem to get this). The sentence was not the reason for the warning. The warning was aimed at any further attempts to play the victim.
You utter falsehoods repeatedly even though I have repeatedly told you they are simply not true. Even in this conversation, you repeat your mantra of "you threatened to ban me for one sentence". If it was a mistake, a misunderstanding, and you used it only once before being corrected, I would feel differently. However you use it repeatedly even though being told it is wrong. That is a lie in my book.
I agree though, you are being very petty in this conversation, so I won't respond to you any more. I've already given the fair warning, and this conversation is getting in the way of actual discussion.
