Noah's Ark

[mediamogul]

Drich I have a question.

What would it take for you to believe that the story of Noah was untrue or at least unsupported by fact?

If God told me it was not true, I suppose there would be little i could say. That said, I do not question the facts or lack of them that support the genesis account of the flood. As i said in the beginning this is a matter of faith.

So here I have shown the original quote where you state that your belief in the bible is not a matter of evidence. You claim, read above, it is a matter of faith. Then when we started talking about how you know the bible is true you started talking about "evidence" but never listed what the evidence was. You simply continued with the circular bible argument, which we have all heard a million times. Then you stated that no other religions make the claim your book makes (while denying that no other monotheistic religions claim a 'personal' relationship with god). Finally you have stated that you have "evidence" by what scripture promised you but have yet to actually list anything that could be considered actual scientifically verifiable evidence. That about catches us up. What then is this undeniable evidence that you have, in such a cloak and dagger way, failed to mention up until this point? You'd think that would be something you would state right up front. So please enlighten us.