(March 23, 2012 at 6:01 pm)tobie Wrote:All brands of nationalism concern themselves with the wellbeing of their own kind. Individuals who use nations for their individual goals(like Hitler), are those who drive their nations into turmoil and war.(March 23, 2012 at 5:46 pm)kılıç_mehmet Wrote:(March 23, 2012 at 5:40 pm)reverendjeremiah Wrote: Mehmet...as I have said before...and i will keep saying.
A turd, by any other name is still a turd. Musolini called his nationalistic turd "fascism". Hitler called his nationalistic turd "Nazism". You call your nationalistic turd "panturkism".
Seems nationalistic ideological turds go by many names these days.
And I will repeat this: I am a nationalist.
I support nationalism as it's the only way for a nation to survive and thrive independently of others.
It's this simple. You only support the enslavement of nations by opposing nationalism. You sit in your first world country, complain about capitalism, complain about the police, advocate anarchy, and still go to bed with a full belly.
I think that you are the biggest hypocrite ever, as you contradict yourself.
I embrace myself, by embracing my people.
You argue that your brand of nationalism is the only way for your nation to survive. How can you ignore the many nations the Turkish people throughout history have claimed lordship over? How were these nations existence less important than yours?
Individuals who serve their nations like our founder, the great Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, lead their nations to glory, unity and peace. The goal of a nationalist is to serve his nation.
And the many nations we "had" claimed lordship over?
Why should I care about them? Do they care about me? They all have their own nations now, for which they had revolted against our rule, and are no longer under our rule. They go their way, we go our way.
They have absolutely nothing that we could want from them.
Üze Tengri basmasar, asra Yir telinmeser, Türük bodun ilingin törüngin kim artatı udaçı erti?