(April 22, 2012 at 6:12 am)Christian Wrote: The naturalism, empiricism and the ethical theories of atheism are false. An atheist passes the burden of proof to the theist and then starts finding what he regards as flaws in each theistic proof, and believes his position is justified.
What ethical theories? Have you even read this thread for people defining atheism a million times?
Naturalism and Empiricism is false? You can only do that if reality is false.
We PASS the burden of proof? Is the burden of proof on you to disprove invisible dragons, unicorns and faeries instead of any who propose their existence is real?
Are you even reading what you write? You basically just said all science is wrong, and atheism has an ethical theory shared by all atheists, then go on to say that we PASSED the burden of proof for an unfalsifiable hypothesis is on those who say its highly unlikely.
Before I am tempted to abuse, can you back those statements up with any sort of sense, without becoming even more nonsensical?
Self-authenticating private evidence is useless, because it is indistinguishable from the illusion of it. ― Kel, Kelosophy Blog
If you’re going to watch tele, you should watch Scooby Doo. That show was so cool because every time there’s a church with a ghoul, or a ghost in a school. They looked beneath the mask and what was inside?
The f**king janitor or the dude who runs the waterslide. Throughout history every mystery. Ever solved has turned out to be. Not Magic. ― Tim Minchin, Storm
If you’re going to watch tele, you should watch Scooby Doo. That show was so cool because every time there’s a church with a ghoul, or a ghost in a school. They looked beneath the mask and what was inside?
The f**king janitor or the dude who runs the waterslide. Throughout history every mystery. Ever solved has turned out to be. Not Magic. ― Tim Minchin, Storm
