It is one thing to look at the complexity of life and question how valid evolution etc is to explain it and QUITE another to look at it and simply deduce that it all means an infinite being created it all.
Saying "This is fantastic and there is now way a God didn't do it!" Does not prove anything than what your thoughts are on the subject. If you are going to argue that life as we know it requires some infinite, all powerful, all knowing entity then you have another problem.
If this universe is far too complex it had to be created by a very complex being. Do you believe that God is more or less complex than the universe? If he is more complex than the universe but does not require a creator then why does this universe require a creator?
Before you argue that God is simply spirit and the world is not you still had to prove there is in fact a spiritual world. I am only saying that so you don't think I am making an unfair equivocation. I would agree though that if you could somehow prove the following your case would be more convincing:
A) Prove there is a spiritual world
B) Prove how there can be any evidence for a being which is by definition non-testable
C) Provide arguments that actually prove something instead of stating your own awe and wonder about our universe
Saying "This is fantastic and there is now way a God didn't do it!" Does not prove anything than what your thoughts are on the subject. If you are going to argue that life as we know it requires some infinite, all powerful, all knowing entity then you have another problem.
If this universe is far too complex it had to be created by a very complex being. Do you believe that God is more or less complex than the universe? If he is more complex than the universe but does not require a creator then why does this universe require a creator?
Before you argue that God is simply spirit and the world is not you still had to prove there is in fact a spiritual world. I am only saying that so you don't think I am making an unfair equivocation. I would agree though that if you could somehow prove the following your case would be more convincing:
A) Prove there is a spiritual world
B) Prove how there can be any evidence for a being which is by definition non-testable
C) Provide arguments that actually prove something instead of stating your own awe and wonder about our universe
