Jireh, I think many of us if not all of us here would freely admit we do not know the cause of the universe. If any of us did know that we would be able to get a nobel prize and a whole lot of money.
A complete naturalistic worldview cannot be proven beyond 100% because deity itself cannot be disproven 100%. The problem isn't about what can't be disproven but rather what can be proven. It has been REPEATEDLY STATED in this thread that strong atheism cannot support its position to a 100% certainty.
However it has also been demonstrated THROUGH NUMEROUS examples on how strong atheists are not being unreasonable anymore than you are being unreasonable on your "atheism with unicorns" etc.
A complete naturalistic worldview cannot be proven beyond 100% because deity itself cannot be disproven 100%. The problem isn't about what can't be disproven but rather what can be proven. It has been REPEATEDLY STATED in this thread that strong atheism cannot support its position to a 100% certainty.
However it has also been demonstrated THROUGH NUMEROUS examples on how strong atheists are not being unreasonable anymore than you are being unreasonable on your "atheism with unicorns" etc.
