(August 22, 2009 at 9:41 pm)amw79 Wrote: I've read and understood JP, but your willful negligence to accept my challenge - Succinctly explain or put forward this argument (atuality/potentiality) without resort to entangled definitions or theological presumptions, references, definitions and assertions. In English if you can. - only goes to show that you are nothing more than a well educated apologist. You're clearly a very intelligent fella, if only we had people like you fighting for scientific progression, social equality, social justice, instead of wasting your life on fairy-tales -the world might be a better place.Well, no. It doesn't "show" anything. I've already put forth the argument without resorting to fallacies, and addressed all the responses to it (so far). I've also explained it several times by repeating it in different versions verbally and explanations. But I'm tired of repeating myself, and therefore tired of this thread because it is all I am being asked to do.
The people who are the most bigoted are the people who have no convictions at all.
-G. K. Chesterton
-G. K. Chesterton
