(April 30, 2012 at 1:41 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: The point is that I could write extensively about the issue and provide proof texts, etc. But I'm not going to waste my time doing so for you because you would not seriously reflect on anything I offer. The questions of those who ignore evidence without consideration can be ignored without consideration.
Dude, you threw your hypothesis out there as if it had any basis in fact. It's your job to back it up with evidence or at least a scriptural reference. It's not my job to promise I'll be impressed.
Don't whine when a skeptic who's heard liberal Christians cry "wolf" so many times before is honest enough to tell you that he's expecting yet another example of a long line of vacuous theological fantasies based on nothing but imagination. Either prove me wrong or don't cry "foul" for being dismissed.
Put up or shut up.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
