DeeTee Wrote:in reality, those not involved in the alledged crime do not have a clue as to what they are talking about and do more damge than good.
Here is what we know. The man has publically apologized for his role in the scandal, and is quoted as saying, "Definitely the parents should have been informed. That's quite clear."
So, we know he has taken responsibilty, and acknowledged that parents were not informed while simultaneously admitting that he failed to share what he knew. I'm not sure why you think everyone is just spouting off without the facts. This is quite enough to know this man is complicit in this whole scandal. Your insistance that everyone is jumping to conclusions and does not know enough is coming across as sympathy for what this man has done.
He needs to be held accountable for his actions just as anoyone outside of a religious hierarchy
such as the Catholic church would.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell