RE: Jesus forgiving sin is unjust to Victim.
May 10, 2012 at 11:31 am
(This post was last modified: May 10, 2012 at 11:33 am by Anomalocaris.)
In the eyes of xtians, all that counts is their imaginary god in his imaginary caprice might deem himself displeased. When that is imagined to have happened, the alledged prepentrator is imagined to have sined.
That measely, but fleash and blood, humans might be hurt and victimized through some action of the faithful shouldn't really be allowed to register in the mind of the xtian faithful so long as they deem their imaginary god to have not been imaginarily offended. If victimization is deem ed to not be a sin, then it is the fault of the agrieved party and it just sucks to be the victim.
Victims per se don't count, which is why so many xtians throughout the ages down to the present were so very glad to created so many victims.
That measely, but fleash and blood, humans might be hurt and victimized through some action of the faithful shouldn't really be allowed to register in the mind of the xtian faithful so long as they deem their imaginary god to have not been imaginarily offended. If victimization is deem ed to not be a sin, then it is the fault of the agrieved party and it just sucks to be the victim.
Victims per se don't count, which is why so many xtians throughout the ages down to the present were so very glad to created so many victims.
