(August 27, 2009 at 6:15 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: This isn't science, and there is no verifiable evidence to go on. You seem unable to climb out of that play pen. Jon Paul has presented unrefuted logic and reasoning. No matter what you say your criticisms are entirely ineffective against it until you succeed otherwise.
If there's no verifiable evidence of any form, then it's not only not science, it's not rational.
If the reasoning is so solid it would add credence to the notion, it would be evidence....
It's not evidence, so whatever you call 'reasoning' is actually completely unreasonable - if you want to be rational that is
EvF
