And you still continue to simply dodge it.
Do you understand the definition of evidence? Evidence=something that gives credence to a belief.
If this 'logic', this 'reasoning' that you speak of gives credence then it's evidence. But you claim there can be no evidence...so that's a contradiciton there.
This 'reasoning' is not evidence, so it's not a reasonable reason to believe...if it gave credence then it would be reasonable and would be evidence.
How many times have I said that it's irrational by definiton if it's without evidence? And how many times have you went back and forth from saying there can be no evidence at all, to saying there can me non-empirical evidence...or even logical proof for God - which as I have said....proof is as fucking strong evidence as you can get, so that's a massive contradiction to your whole 'no evidence' thing. You contradict yourself.
EvF
Do you understand the definition of evidence? Evidence=something that gives credence to a belief.
If this 'logic', this 'reasoning' that you speak of gives credence then it's evidence. But you claim there can be no evidence...so that's a contradiciton there.
This 'reasoning' is not evidence, so it's not a reasonable reason to believe...if it gave credence then it would be reasonable and would be evidence.
How many times have I said that it's irrational by definiton if it's without evidence? And how many times have you went back and forth from saying there can be no evidence at all, to saying there can me non-empirical evidence...or even logical proof for God - which as I have said....proof is as fucking strong evidence as you can get, so that's a massive contradiction to your whole 'no evidence' thing. You contradict yourself.
EvF