Nothing new? Why I wonder?
Because once again you ignore my point
And you have once again repeated that I have to refute JP and Arcanus' 'clear logic'...and what I'm repeating is what you have repeatedly ignored/dodged...and that's the matter that you're saying on the one hand there can be no evidence, and on the other saying there can be/there's proof...you contradict yourself....
Ooh dear, I repeated a small fraction of my last post...perhaps it's because you ignored me again and yet you repeated that JP/Arcanus' logic is sound, once more. Another baseless assertion from yourself. You don't expect me to request for evidence? Sorry but if you spout an assertion I'm going to.
If you're going to say there logic is sound I'll ask "where?", and "how?", and "what logic are you talking about exactly?"... and I'll ask for evidence...so evidence please
EvF
Because once again you ignore my point
And you have once again repeated that I have to refute JP and Arcanus' 'clear logic'...and what I'm repeating is what you have repeatedly ignored/dodged...and that's the matter that you're saying on the one hand there can be no evidence, and on the other saying there can be/there's proof...you contradict yourself....
Ooh dear, I repeated a small fraction of my last post...perhaps it's because you ignored me again and yet you repeated that JP/Arcanus' logic is sound, once more. Another baseless assertion from yourself. You don't expect me to request for evidence? Sorry but if you spout an assertion I'm going to.
If you're going to say there logic is sound I'll ask "where?", and "how?", and "what logic are you talking about exactly?"... and I'll ask for evidence...so evidence please
EvF
