RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus?
May 24, 2012 at 8:24 am
(This post was last modified: May 24, 2012 at 8:28 am by Phil.)
(May 23, 2012 at 11:12 pm)Aiza Wrote: Are you SERIOUSLY not only trying to dispute this, but even calling me a liar of it? I know you dislike me but this is ridiculous!No I am not disputing anything. If you quoted the very next sentence of my post you would see that I simply misread your post but judging from your partial quote of my post, you are still arrogant and condescending as ever.
(May 23, 2012 at 11:12 pm)Aiza Wrote: The baby was missing part of his brain, he wasn't brainless. Either way, no mother is going to consider the son she loves "just meat". I'd hope that if anyone here were to get in an accident and lose most of their brain with only 8 hours to live, their mother would be right there at their bedside, not going on about "just meat" or whatever. That is how mothers (and fathers) are with their babies. Usually.
Again, this is just a thing you need to have some empathy and humanity to understand. I can't even imagine how painful it must have been for her, but at least now she has that time she spent with him, no matter how brief it was. He was well loved. I am tearing up.
In anencephaly the brainstem is present. What is missing is most of the skull, scalp and forebrain. I have no idea why anyone here is claiming the baby isn't conscious as he is and is actually aware of his environment (that is controlled by the brainstem and is a cognitive process)
