RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus?
May 25, 2012 at 9:55 pm
(This post was last modified: May 25, 2012 at 9:56 pm by Phil.)
(May 25, 2012 at 9:53 pm)Annik Wrote:(May 25, 2012 at 9:39 pm)Phil Wrote: Pretty much exactly what I was asking for and oddly enough, it agrees with me in saying that top neuroscientists aren't sure of the process so how can you (not a neuroscientist) make the claim that our thoughts are about something when even they can't make that claim? Are you going to end this merry-go-round and retract your claim now or at least admit that it has no scientific backing and is a faith based (not religious) claim?
I won't retract my statement. I'm thinking about ice cream right now. I don't know how my brain is processing this, but I know I am now thinking about ice cream. The article says that we do not know how the impulses get translated into thought, not that the impulses do not get translated into thought. I'm really not a 100% sure (or even 10%) where you intend to go with this.
Then admit it is based on faith much like a theist who is sure god exists because he has subjective experience.
(May 25, 2012 at 9:54 pm)RaphielDrake Wrote: I more or less just settled this, why are we continuing?
No you didn't and it is arrogant to think you did.
