[split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action

Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!

Current time: July 2, 2024, 1:51 am

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Thread Modes

[split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action

Gambit Offline

Member

Religious Views: I'm not so sure anymore

Posts: 739
Threads: 30
Joined: April 28, 2012
Reputation: 17

#33

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action

May 30, 2012 at 8:42 pm (This post was last modified: May 30, 2012 at 8:42 pm by Gambit.)

I mentioned on another thread that I dislike him, purely based on the fact that his name is Mehmet. Anyway, this thread started off boring and then continued to suck the life out of me for over 5 pages. That dude who says that Mehmet blatantly promotes (his) nationalism is right, though. He's a Mehmet; they're like that. Go to the thread I'm talking about, before judging me.

Find

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

[split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Shell B - May 25, 2012 at 10:18 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by kılıç_mehmet - May 30, 2012 at 7:20 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Shell B - May 30, 2012 at 7:28 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Paul the Human - May 30, 2012 at 7:56 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Gambit - May 30, 2012 at 8:42 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Shell B - May 30, 2012 at 8:45 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Gambit - May 30, 2012 at 9:10 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Shell B - May 30, 2012 at 9:16 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Gambit - May 30, 2012 at 9:24 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Shell B - May 30, 2012 at 9:28 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Gambit - May 30, 2012 at 9:35 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Shell B - May 30, 2012 at 9:42 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Reforged - May 30, 2012 at 10:00 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Tiberius - May 31, 2012 at 5:10 am

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Angrboda - May 31, 2012 at 1:00 am

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Kayenneh - May 31, 2012 at 1:42 am

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Annik - May 31, 2012 at 1:52 am

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by NoMoreFaith - May 31, 2012 at 5:46 am

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Violet - May 31, 2012 at 6:04 am

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Reforged - May 31, 2012 at 6:13 am

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Violet - May 31, 2012 at 6:20 am

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Reforged - May 31, 2012 at 6:36 am

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Violet - May 31, 2012 at 7:02 am

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Reforged - May 31, 2012 at 7:29 am

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Violet - May 31, 2012 at 2:25 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Shell B - May 31, 2012 at 2:37 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Reforged - May 31, 2012 at 2:43 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Shell B - May 31, 2012 at 2:49 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Reforged - May 31, 2012 at 2:57 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Violet - May 31, 2012 at 3:01 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Violet - May 31, 2012 at 2:52 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Reforged - May 31, 2012 at 3:05 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Violet - May 31, 2012 at 3:16 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Reforged - May 31, 2012 at 3:33 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Cinjin - May 31, 2012 at 3:25 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Violet - May 31, 2012 at 3:45 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by SophiaGrace - June 1, 2012 at 7:20 am

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Anomalocaris - June 1, 2012 at 2:21 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Tempus - June 1, 2012 at 2:43 am

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by LastPoet - June 1, 2012 at 8:47 am

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Autumnlicious - June 1, 2012 at 2:17 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Napoléon - June 1, 2012 at 2:44 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Shell B - June 1, 2012 at 3:16 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by frankiej - June 1, 2012 at 3:18 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Napoléon - June 1, 2012 at 3:36 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Shell B - June 1, 2012 at 3:54 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Napoléon - June 1, 2012 at 4:02 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Shell B - June 1, 2012 at 4:03 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Napoléon - June 1, 2012 at 4:09 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Shell B - June 1, 2012 at 4:20 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Paul the Human - June 1, 2012 at 4:27 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Reforged - June 1, 2012 at 5:07 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Shell B - June 1, 2012 at 5:10 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Reforged - June 1, 2012 at 5:11 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Paul the Human - June 1, 2012 at 5:13 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Reforged - June 1, 2012 at 5:15 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Shell B - June 1, 2012 at 5:57 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Violet - June 1, 2012 at 6:07 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Reforged - June 1, 2012 at 6:10 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Violet - June 2, 2012 at 1:11 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Reforged - June 2, 2012 at 1:17 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Jackalope - June 1, 2012 at 6:16 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Angrboda - June 1, 2012 at 11:09 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Reforged - June 2, 2012 at 10:14 am

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by kılıç_mehmet - June 2, 2012 at 1:19 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by Reforged - June 2, 2012 at 1:25 pm

RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action - by kılıç_mehmet - June 2, 2012 at 1:27 pm

RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus? - by Cinjin - May 25, 2012 at 10:57 pm

RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus? - by Reforged - May 26, 2012 at 6:15 am

RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus? - by KichigaiNeko - May 26, 2012 at 6:39 am

RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus? - by Reforged - May 26, 2012 at 6:44 am

RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus? - by KichigaiNeko - May 26, 2012 at 9:47 am

RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus? - by Shell B - May 26, 2012 at 11:08 am

RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus? - by Tiberius - May 26, 2012 at 12:14 pm

RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus? - by Reforged - May 30, 2012 at 4:12 pm

RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus? - by Faith No More - May 30, 2012 at 4:25 pm

RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus? - by Shell B - May 30, 2012 at 4:40 pm

RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus? - by Reforged - May 30, 2012 at 4:55 pm

RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus? - by Shell B - May 30, 2012 at 5:09 pm

RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus? - by Reforged - May 30, 2012 at 5:25 pm

RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus? - by Faith No More - May 30, 2012 at 5:40 pm

RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus? - by Reforged - May 30, 2012 at 5:53 pm

RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus? - by Faith No More - May 30, 2012 at 6:02 pm

RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus? - by Reforged - May 30, 2012 at 6:12 pm

RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus? - by kılıç_mehmet - May 30, 2012 at 6:24 pm

RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus? - by Shell B - May 30, 2012 at 6:29 pm

RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus? - by Faith No More - May 30, 2012 at 6:34 pm

RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus? - by Shell B - May 30, 2012 at 6:39 pm

RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus? - by Reforged - May 30, 2012 at 6:47 pm

RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus? - by kılıç_mehmet - May 30, 2012 at 6:50 pm

RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus? - by Napoléon - May 30, 2012 at 7:32 pm

RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus? - by Shell B - May 30, 2012 at 7:42 pm

RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus? - by Reforged - May 30, 2012 at 6:52 pm

RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus? - by kılıç_mehmet - May 30, 2012 at 7:01 pm

RE: Baby born with anencephaly to please jesus? - by Shell B - May 30, 2012 at 7:06 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread		Author	Replies	Views	Last Post
	i keep getting contradictory messages from staff	rocinantexyz	12	2719	November 29, 2022 at 4:37 pm Last Post: Nay_Sayer
	Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.	Whateverist	4493	712782	March 31, 2021 at 5:55 am Last Post: The Valkyrie
	Petition Poll for username change	Foxaèr	17	2383	March 7, 2021 at 9:38 am Last Post: Foxaèr
	Dear Staff	Foxaèr	28	4577	February 5, 2019 at 8:12 am Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
	What happened to the "Civil Discussion" thread?	Angrboda	48	8135	November 19, 2018 at 9:13 am Last Post: Angrboda
	Make the "civil" discussion part of the forum invisible to non members	Pat Mustard	54	8762	November 18, 2018 at 10:59 pm Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
	Me no like change. Me sad	Pat Mustard	12	1465	September 21, 2018 at 6:47 pm Last Post: Pat Mustard
	Eliminate Automatic Insertion of Horizontal Rule	Neo-Scholastic	21	3258	November 29, 2017 at 11:10 pm Last Post: Cyberman
	Question about latest forum rule	Catholic_Lady	29	5108	November 14, 2017 at 4:27 pm Last Post: Tiberius
	What Does This Mean, Oh Staff?	Minimalist	24	5941	July 15, 2017 at 1:35 am Last Post: c172

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me