RE: [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action
May 31, 2012 at 3:05 pm
(This post was last modified: May 31, 2012 at 3:07 pm by Reforged.)
(May 31, 2012 at 2:52 pm)Violet Lilly Blossom Wrote: * Violet Lilly Blossom nods at the Shelly.
I don't see any rules that need changing or adding. Y'all got an awesome forum here
* Violet Lilly Blossom dons her farmer's hat, plucks a piece of dead grass out of the field, and lightly chews on it out of the corner of her mouth.
(May 31, 2012 at 2:49 pm)Shell B Wrote: I have brain cells. Objectivity, try it.
What kind of drink is Objectivity if it has left you with brain cells? Seems counterproductive to me
My point is that there is a loophole in the rules that has clearly been exploited to monopolyse multiple threads for a particular purpose regardless of their original subject matter. It prevents free discussion.
I believe this loophole should be closed to prevent any further exploitation by people who have similar ideas of using multiple threads to force their own agenda on others. It would be protecting the very thing which the majority of people go to forums for; the ability to discuss a wide variety of interesting subjects.
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred.
- Abdul Alhazred.