Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 26, 2025, 6:42 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Philosophical reading
#10
RE: Philosophical reading
(June 4, 2012 at 6:31 pm)apophenia Wrote:


David Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature (I've learned that his best arguments are split among the Treatise and Enquiry)
Immanuel Kant, Critique Of Pure Reason
Schopenhauer, The World As Will And Representation
Gottlob Frege (no specific work, there is a good Frege reader)
Ludwig Wittgenstein, Early and Late (Tractatus and Philosophical Investigations)

And from there it wasn't certain; tentatively I had acquired some of Quine's work in the absence of better wisdom.

In addition to being sidetracked by other matters, I've also developed an interest in Greek philosophy, notable Heraclitus and Democritus among the pre-Socratics, and the Stoics, Skeptics, Cynics and Epicureans. Not all that interested in either Plato or Aristotle.
[/b]

Quite the list, I've yet to delve into mathematical philosophy as the actual mathematical knowledge required to fully understand it is beyond my grasp, so no frege just yet, I intend to intriduce myself to set theory through russell and slowly learn maths. I am no real fan of plato or aristotle, they may have started the majority of philosophical inquiries but there is something so rudimentary about their work that just seems unbearable to read. However, they are in need of their due and it is certainly given in my mind Smile The stoics and epicurians were interesting philosophers and I admire their moral perspectives a damn sight more than some others i could mention *cough*JEREMYBENTHAM*cough*

Quote:I very much enjoy Sartre's particular brand of existentialism such that it has been quite influential in the way in which I look at the world. I'm in the process of reading B&N myself after having read several of his other papers and works. His writing can be a little thick, too.

As for Nietzsche, his writing is indeed a little difficult to work through; it takes a careful reading to understand all of what he says.

Indeed, Sartre can be think but with enough post-it notes and time you can eventually dig through die spiele, I've never really had the same understanding of nietzsche, he seems to write in such a contrived manner as to put me off entirely. He is reputedly very good though so I suppose I shall have to force myself through his work someday
Religion is an attempt to answer the philosophical questions of the unphilosophical man.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Philosophical reading - by liam - June 4, 2012 at 4:58 pm
RE: Philosophical reading - by Hovik - June 4, 2012 at 5:00 pm
RE: Philosophical reading - by liam - June 4, 2012 at 5:05 pm
RE: Philosophical reading - by Hovik - June 4, 2012 at 6:24 pm
RE: Philosophical reading - by Epimethean - June 4, 2012 at 5:03 pm
RE: Philosophical reading - by Tobie - June 4, 2012 at 5:53 pm
RE: Philosophical reading - by Rev. Rye - June 4, 2012 at 6:02 pm
RE: Philosophical reading - by liam - June 4, 2012 at 6:22 pm
RE: Philosophical reading - by Angrboda - June 4, 2012 at 6:31 pm
RE: Philosophical reading - by liam - June 4, 2012 at 6:43 pm
RE: Philosophical reading - by Angrboda - June 4, 2012 at 7:00 pm
RE: Philosophical reading - by liam - June 4, 2012 at 7:22 pm
RE: Philosophical reading - by Angrboda - June 4, 2012 at 7:29 pm
RE: Philosophical reading - by liam - June 4, 2012 at 7:44 pm
RE: Philosophical reading - by Rev. Rye - June 4, 2012 at 8:12 pm
RE: Philosophical reading - by padraic - June 4, 2012 at 7:44 pm
RE: Philosophical reading - by liam - June 4, 2012 at 7:49 pm
RE: Philosophical reading - by padraic - June 4, 2012 at 8:22 pm
RE: Philosophical reading - by liam - June 4, 2012 at 8:45 pm
RE: Philosophical reading - by Angrboda - June 4, 2012 at 9:00 pm
RE: Philosophical reading - by amateurlyinsightful - June 24, 2012 at 12:40 pm
RE: Philosophical reading - by Kayenneh - June 24, 2012 at 11:40 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Video thread for interesting philosophical discussions on YouTube and elsewhere GrandizerII 2 465 August 26, 2020 at 8:43 am
Last Post: GrandizerII
  Philosophical zombies robvalue 131 21275 March 7, 2018 at 3:58 pm
Last Post: polymath257
  A Philosophical Conundrum BrianSoddingBoru4 11 2237 October 27, 2017 at 9:23 pm
Last Post: ignoramus
  Philosophical zombie. robybar 3 1895 June 8, 2017 at 8:21 am
Last Post: bennyboy
  Philosophical ideas and acting "as though" bennyboy 12 2741 March 31, 2017 at 11:15 am
Last Post: henryp
  What philosophical evidence is there against believing in non-physical entities? joseph_ 150 17456 September 3, 2016 at 11:26 am
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  On kids reading Harry Potter? TrueChristian 139 18185 February 9, 2016 at 10:48 pm
Last Post: bennyboy
  Arguments for God from a purely philosophical perspective Aegon 13 3599 January 24, 2016 at 2:44 am
Last Post: robvalue
  A Great Philosophical Question. Pyrrho 26 7856 September 28, 2015 at 11:31 am
Last Post: Pyrrho
  One philosophical argument for existence of supernatural. Mystic 59 17879 July 20, 2015 at 10:01 pm
Last Post: Cato



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)