Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 28, 2024, 9:53 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Philosophical zombie.
#1
Philosophical zombie.
Hello everyone. 
For those who don't know what a Philosophical zombie is, here is how wiki defines it

"A philosophical zombie [...] is a hypothetical being that from the outside is indistinguishable from a normal human being but lacks conscious experiencequalia, or . For example, if a philosophical zombie was poked with a sharp object it would not feel any pain sensation, yet could behave exactly as if it does feel pain (it may say "ouch", recoil from the stimulus, and say that it is feeling pain)"
 
Now: i was wondering if, virtually, could a p.zombie really exist. I see it as a nonsense,  and here is why

I am atheist. I'm a rational person and don't believe in phantoms, ghosts and souls. I think that the consciousness is a result of a connected net of cells integrating and coworking with each others, by elaborating external stimuli. No such thing as a soul could exist, because it should be a non-physical and supernatural force, that means that:
1)something that is not made of energy and matter could not interact with energy and matter, thus we can't be driven by this force. We are,  instead, conditioned by our brain, and every damage or malfunction in this organ will affect our consciousness and functionality. Also, if a soul interacted with our material brain there would have to be some kind of energy transfer/creation and so we would be able to detect it.
2)a soul, if real, by definition could do well without a "bodily shell", so our matter-energy world would be useless in order for a soul to exist.

I think most of you could easily agree with my thoughts about soul (at least the part "soul does not exist!"). 
Now, assumed that we are just a connection between cells that simply elaborate stimuli, let's come back to the main topic.
A philosophical zombie would, by definition, be without a real consciousness. But if consciousness rose from complexity, and a pz HAS to be complex enough in order to produce human-like responses,  then, it necessairily HAS to have a consciousness. It must have a net of wired "cells" or whatevers, just like a real human being.
So how could a philosophical zombie be real? If it is capable of elaborating responses, answers and argue about philosophy, just like us, and it has to do so in order to behave as a human, how could it not have a self-consciousness?

Some of you could argue that it wouldn't have any emotion or feeling, but if WE have them (and we are just a bunch of cells) why should a pz not be able to fall in love, get angry etc...? Afterall, it (he?she?) displays feelings and we could be sure that they are genuine just as we do when relating with a human!

What do you think?
"I cannot persuade myself that a beneficent & omnipotent God would have designedly created the Ichneumonidæ with the express intention of their feeding within the living bodies of caterpillars, or that a cat should play with mice."

Charles Robert Darwin, Letter to Asa Gray (22 may 1860)
Reply
#2
RE: Philosophical zombie.
(June 7, 2017 at 12:27 pm)robybar Wrote: But if consciousness rose from complexity, and a pz HAS to be complex enough in order to produce human-like responses,  then, it necessairily HAS to have a consciousness.

That's a big 'if'. I don't believe that consciousness results from surpassing a certain threshhold of complexity alone. That doesn't seem to provide anything like a real explanation for consciousness. Just: complexity -> boom, consciousness!
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
#3
RE: Philosophical zombie.
Some people would go the other way with that, and ask whether or not -we- are the p-zombies.  I also wonder whether there's some threshold in which a system "wakes up" as it were, to consciousness..whereas before it was just complex processing, for example. It does seem as though complexity must play a part in some individual example of consciousness (I don't expect a cat to have quite as rich a consiousness as my own - but who knows, right?)..but it's fairly easy to suggest that the idea of a hard dividing line is bound up more in our language and how we think about this than in any evidence or data to support that conclusion.

Consciousness may be a sliding scale, but even then..I don't see how complexity, itself, makes it happen. Bridges are complex too. Plants are so complex our consciousness cannot fully comprehend or explain how they do what they do (and, to sweeten the pot, they demonstrably exhibit the recognizable behaviors of conscious creatures). Neither seems to be concious, at least, not in the way that we are - if we are, if there's a specific way. The whole subject is kind-of a rat's nest of tangled propositions.

But, for agreement! I think that there; something incoherent about the p-zombie proposition myself. An entity that is not only equally complex, but equally complex in a host of specified ways? A creature, for example, with a brain just like ours (or it's equivalent)...with behaviors just like ours (or their equivalents)..and yet, not like us? That's like picking up two identical toasters..except that one of them is, mysteriously, a HAM radio.....
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#4
RE: Philosophical zombie.
Yeah, I'm not sure that in order to mimic human behaviors accurately, you'd have to be as complex as a human anyway. Surely, things like reproduction and organic redundancy for survival don't really matter, since we're really just talking about a mind in a vehicle.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Video thread for interesting philosophical discussions on YouTube and elsewhere GrandizerII 2 293 August 26, 2020 at 8:43 am
Last Post: GrandizerII
  Philosophical zombies robvalue 131 15256 March 7, 2018 at 3:58 pm
Last Post: polymath257
  A Philosophical Conundrum BrianSoddingBoru4 11 1730 October 27, 2017 at 9:23 pm
Last Post: ignoramus
  Philosophical ideas and acting "as though" bennyboy 12 2084 March 31, 2017 at 11:15 am
Last Post: henryp
  What philosophical evidence is there against believing in non-physical entities? joseph_ 150 12078 September 3, 2016 at 11:26 am
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  Arguments for God from a purely philosophical perspective Aegon 13 2861 January 24, 2016 at 2:44 am
Last Post: robvalue
  A Great Philosophical Question. Pyrrho 26 6436 September 28, 2015 at 11:31 am
Last Post: Pyrrho
  One philosophical argument for existence of supernatural. Mystic 59 15716 July 20, 2015 at 10:01 pm
Last Post: Cato
  Philosophical Underpinnings for Rejecting God learncritic 28 8892 June 1, 2015 at 10:26 pm
Last Post: ignoramus
  Philosophical Quietism Pizza 9 3032 February 11, 2015 at 8:59 pm
Last Post: Pizza



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)