RE: The harms of religion
June 6, 2012 at 7:35 pm
(This post was last modified: June 6, 2012 at 7:39 pm by StatCrux.)
(June 6, 2012 at 7:24 pm)Annik Wrote:(June 6, 2012 at 7:14 pm)StatCrux Wrote: Two definitions required, safe and responsible, regarding sex. Does your definition of safe include psychological issues? Is it responsible for 16 year old persons to engage in sexual activity without interpersonal commitment to a long lasting relationship? Are they capable of such decisions without a societal structure? BTW the question was about 13-16 year olds
And I answered with what I thought to be acceptable, 16 would be as young as I would set the age of consent.
Safe and responsible mean that they engage in safe sex, as to not cause unwanted pregnancy.
So you disagree with brian37 that sex should be allowed between consensual persons, with no caveat? You think that sex between two consenting 16 year old children is acceptable, outside of societal structures and providing they use contraception?
