The harms of religion

[Hovik]

Yes. Yes it is invalid, actually. You can't tell somebody they can't do what they want because it upsets you when there's no good reason otherwise why they shouldn't.

So emotional response reaction should be disregarded when we speak about consensual sex in 16 year old persons? The only issue is consent?

I believe you're misunderstanding me. My personal feelings about the topic of consensual sex between 16-year-olds is irrelevant to the discussion, just as your personal feelings are irrelevant.

What I'm disputing is your inclusion of emotionally-charged and arbitrary terms like 'promiscuous' and creating straw man arguments that are meant to evoke an irrelevant emotional reaction instead of careful, rational discourse.