(June 14, 2012 at 2:57 pm)Undeceived Wrote:(June 14, 2012 at 9:16 am)Rhythm Wrote: Those gaps could just as easily disabuse us of some particular notion as they could reinforce them, which is why, for example, I asked for a pre-cambrian platypus.You're asking for a date that doesn't exist. According to creationism, the earth is no more than 6,000 years old. If you carbon-dated the oldest fossils, that's how old they would come out to be (Google carbon-dated dinosaurs. Not only do their fossils contain carbon which should all have decayed long ago, but the dates correspond uncannily to the Christian Bible). All cambrian dates are done with K-Ar or similar methods done on the rocks around the fossil. The methods require an assumption that the earth is old. If the earth is young, K-Ar is not accurate. We see this in the rocks of recent volcanic eruptions. We know the rocks are young, but they date to millions or billions of years (it's all over the place). They are simply too contaminated with the daughter isotope.
![[Image: Dodo.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=washingtonbus.org%2Fblog%2Fblog-images%2FDodo.jpg)
Uh, yeah.....<ahrrrm...>