Two main things:
a) a rock has less potential energy,
b) a rock cannot transform energy from outside itself into work or potential energy at anything but a miniscule fraction of what you can,
therefore, you can support more processes, more complex processes, and for a longer time.
Eventually, because of your composition, that will likely end as well in a rock like state (though not necessarily). In a word, the difference is energy.
Pointing to the different possibilities implicit in your structural composition is certainly valid, but without energy that doesn't matter. (There's a joke that a mom is a device for turning cheeseburgers into people. And it's true, a mother is taking in energy or potential energy, and turning it into a living being.)
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)