The Creationists' Nightmare

[Undeceived]

If you're proposing that the Grand Canyon was formed after the flood, then why doesn't the rest of the world look like it's been flooded and eroded to that extent? I find it suspicious that the Grand Canyon is the only example of the flood that creationists can give in terms of erosion and stuff.

The topic was consistency in dating, not the Flood. The "dates" for each of those layers are progressively older in the millions, but the lack of erosion contradicts these dates.

You call these sources?

I gave the first link because it contained tables of a number of dates for one rock set. I'm having an extremely hard time finding an unabridged list of such dates, as I said before. Usually evolution and creation sites both pick only the "convenient" ones. If you can find an impartial list, please post it! In a meta-analysis, it does not matter who wrote it, unless you think them capable of creating false evidence. The second link simply had a nice picture, and I referred only to the picture. Ad hominems are not going to get us anywhere. Find us a journaled meta-analysis--they seem very well hidden.

---

Why should I consider Terry's opinion equal to that of geochronologists and geologists when it comes to the Grand Canyon?

Pray tell me, what are geochronologists' and geologists' opinions when it comes to the Grand Canyon? It's hard to find a secular page that mentions the level strata.