The Creationists' Nightmare

[Anomalocaris]

If you're proposing that the Grand Canyon was formed after the flood, then why doesn't the rest of the world look like it's been flooded and eroded to that extent? I find it suspicious that the Grand Canyon is the only example of the flood that creationists can give in terms of erosion and stuff.

The topic was consistency in dating, not the Flood. The "dates" for each of those layers are progressively older in the millions, but the lack of erosion contradicts these dates.

You call these sources?

I gave the first link because it contained tables of a number of dates for one rock set. I'm having an extremely hard time finding an unabridged list of such dates, as I said before. Usually evolution and creation sites both pick only the "convenient" ones. If you can find an impartial list, please post it! In a meta-analysis, it does not matter who wrote it, unless you think them capable of creating false evidence. The second link simply had a nice picture, and I referred only to the picture. Ad hominems are not going to get us anywhere. Find us a journaled meta-analysis--they seem very well hidden.

---

Why should I consider Terry's opinion equal to that of geochronologists and geologists when it comes to the Grand Canyon?

Pray tell me, what are geochronologists' and geologists' opinions when it comes to the Grand Canyon? It's hard to find a secular page that mentions the level strata.

Why do people who are naturally stupid to begin with insist on making themselves even more stupid by reading the creationist bullshit?

Erosion and deposition are opposing processes, Moron, When there is deposition, there is no erosion. Erosion of a particular layer not only require deposition stops, but also that the overlaying, younger layers vovering the particular layer all erode away. Erosion only start when a layer is EXPOSED. If an anceint layer remain bauried continously burned for 100 trillion years by the products of new deposition, it will show no erotion inspite of its 100 tirllion years, you moron.

The stratigraphy of the Grand Canyon sequence is primarily a record of prolonged despoition as settlmentary layers are laid down continuously layer upon layer.
What fuck erotion would you expect to see in a 2 billion year old layer that was continuously buried until its exposure by coloroado river erosion within the last few thousand years? Moron?

As it turns out, if you know ehere to look, there is trememdous amount of evidence of extremely lengthy erosion in the Grand Canyon.

Look up "Ordovician Inconformity" in a real geological source, moron, instead of your creationist crap.