(June 20, 2012 at 7:05 am)FallentoReason Wrote:Reading comprehension problem on your part. IT IS CALLED SARCASMBrian37 Wrote:We should kill everyone who claims an invisible friend
What the hell is this?
You took that out of context, that is your baggage, not mine.
If you read all of what I said my message is that we cannot nor should we force anyone to our position. Theism and state dogmatism already do a bang up job using violence to get people to conform.
I am poking fun and ridiculing the idea that blasphemy makes someone "militant".
Being offended in an open society with free market of speech is going to happen. Otherwise we reduce ourselves to violence we say we rightfully reject.
We have a choice as a species. We all give each other the right to bitch and offend, with the agreement that no one has to die over words, and let those words compete, or we kill each other.
So which would you prefer? Would you prefer to live in a world where a "fuck you" is the worst you get? Or do you want to live in a state where the government plays thought police?