(June 29, 2012 at 7:19 am)JohnDG Wrote: At the end you will never beleive me, because you never looked into it yourself.
I took your invitation to read your links you did present, and found none of them presented any evidence, just opinion and conjecture. You're assuming I don't believe you because I don't want to, rather than I don't believe it because there is no evidence. A more than reasonable skeptical position.
I'm not trying to be deliberately egregious, but I resent being told that I am not considering the facts, when all there is, that I find the facts (depending on the article) being presented to be propaganda itself and somewhat baseless.
Not agreeing with you doesn't mean I didn't consider what you had to say. It means I am skeptical about the claims being made and the reasoning used to arrive at the conclusion.
Self-authenticating private evidence is useless, because it is indistinguishable from the illusion of it. ― Kel, Kelosophy Blog
If you’re going to watch tele, you should watch Scooby Doo. That show was so cool because every time there’s a church with a ghoul, or a ghost in a school. They looked beneath the mask and what was inside?
The f**king janitor or the dude who runs the waterslide. Throughout history every mystery. Ever solved has turned out to be. Not Magic. ― Tim Minchin, Storm
If you’re going to watch tele, you should watch Scooby Doo. That show was so cool because every time there’s a church with a ghoul, or a ghost in a school. They looked beneath the mask and what was inside?
The f**king janitor or the dude who runs the waterslide. Throughout history every mystery. Ever solved has turned out to be. Not Magic. ― Tim Minchin, Storm
