THE MOST ignorant thing a person can say is to demand empirical evidence of a non empirical subject. I certainly don't call Dawkins ignorant, but I do call his foray into religion so.
Just like his criticism of theologions who violate science in opposing it with religion, his correct assertion, equally he commits the same glaring fallacy in reverse.
Those of you calling me ignorant of theology based on scientific reasoning, I can't laugh enough at you.
Please continue wasting your time with your idiocy.
Me, I shall continue to FULLY appreciate scientific endeavour as much as any scientist, and religion unencumbered by logical fail.
Just like his criticism of theologions who violate science in opposing it with religion, his correct assertion, equally he commits the same glaring fallacy in reverse.
Those of you calling me ignorant of theology based on scientific reasoning, I can't laugh enough at you.
Please continue wasting your time with your idiocy.
Me, I shall continue to FULLY appreciate scientific endeavour as much as any scientist, and religion unencumbered by logical fail.