(July 8, 2012 at 4:52 am)cato123 Wrote: I'm not quite sure why you underlined 'any' since I directed you to Acts 15.
For the slow and/or scripturally uneducated Christ was clear in that the law will not change until heaven and Earth disappeared. I can't claim any knowledge of heaven; however, I can guarantee that the Earth is still around. Christ never made a difference between moral, ceremonial or judicial laws.
I am standing by with a vat of mustard in anticipation of the huge apologetic pretzel that you will no doubt have to create in order to explain this contradiction away.
I think you're making kind of a BS point. Just because Christ didn't mention a moral/ceremonial/judicial distinction doesn't mean that there isn't one, or that he didn't make the distinction.
Suppose that there is such a distinction, and that I'm explaining the law to you. I don't have to mention the distinction; I can just describe the laws to you, and you can draw the distinction yourself.
Like, a guy who draws a circle and a square doesn't have to also say, "There is a distinction between round things and things with corners".
“The truth of our faith becomes a matter of ridicule among the infidels if any Catholic, not gifted with the necessary scientific learning, presents as dogma what scientific scrutiny shows to be false.”
