RE: An UNBIASED summary of the candidates' views?
July 9, 2012 at 11:53 am
(This post was last modified: July 9, 2012 at 11:54 am by Autumnlicious.)
So you see Romney as just as good as Obama?
'A pox on both your houses' sounds deep, but really is what a child would do - "I'm taking my ball home".
Withholding votes would only yield results if there were consequences for candidates getting below a certain threshold of votes, regardless if they hold the "majority" of said votes.
As of now, there are no such conditionals or consequences in America, save for giving your vote to whomever wins.
Because that's the end result.
In a two party system, you are as much voting against candidates as for.
'A pox on both your houses' sounds deep, but really is what a child would do - "I'm taking my ball home".
Withholding votes would only yield results if there were consequences for candidates getting below a certain threshold of votes, regardless if they hold the "majority" of said votes.
As of now, there are no such conditionals or consequences in America, save for giving your vote to whomever wins.
Because that's the end result.
In a two party system, you are as much voting against candidates as for.
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
